Search:

Yeah but you have mods installed...and you play with a modded faction... try to play with generic faction like Rome...( some mods and patches do not work together very well)

I feel myself able to sometimes enjoy the game...but there are certainly some features missing big time... but i ingore them and try to make the best of the expierience. :-)

Please.. i would like to see this very much in RTW2 :-)

I sometimes enjoy the game, but would like to see more depth like in earlier total war games...so i voted yes.( with at but... )

Yeps, having the same problem too... the etruscal league is blocking the port of karalis.... 80 years.....

CA must take these this seriously and stop telling that it's and excellent game, with multiple awards..on the cover of the DVD-box... how can it have won these awards even before release ? Has it...

I'm not at turn 70 yet... hope i will make it past it... does it just freeze ? can you load your saved gave of autosave ?

Just my thoughts exactly, Medieval 2 TW had the best battle tempo of all total war games... i would love to see CA, do what they must do, and change this. ( or make it "adjustable")

In fact, i think that the client state- thing works better in Rome 2 then it did in most of the other total war games... client states become your vasal or satrapy... i like it better, and it works...

I agree, full stacked battles are way way way to short... imagine a battle between thousands of troops.... that last for just a couple of minutes...that's just stupid...
Sieges are also way to...

Maybe they can, lower the overal attack damage, increase the overall morale and reduce the walking and running speeds for infantry.. ( and get rid of those spear,slinger-trails...)

That's the whole point of a Total war game... it lasts for days, weeks even months sometimes.... Rome wasn't build in 1 day.
But i understand that you personally want so see some progress in you...

Battles should be EPIC, 3 -4 minutes battles .... is like 10% of and average Medieval 2 total war battle....that's how it is now... 3 minutes loading the battle 3 minutes playing the battle, 3...

Yeah, battle speed it way to fast, and the units also move to fast... hope some modders can mod this out so we get a better and more realistic experience... now 33 in, 96% agrees that the speeds...

Battle speed should be like Medieval II total war.... the question is not "why slow", but change the speed like here, it makes me feel more like a rush game, instead of a real battle... you honestly...

Battle speed should be like Medieval II total war.... the question "why slow", but change the speed like here, it makes me feel more like a rush game, instead of a real battle... you honestly like...

I doubt any real total war fan would like to see his battle ended in 3-8 min... when knowing that these times sometimes resemble the loading time to start a battle...

I would like to address to CA that the battle-tempo is way to fast... a battle last for only a couple of minutes...even sieges don't take that long...
I doubt that in these conditions, the battle...