http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070619/D8PRLSMG0.html
Somewhat amusing but since it not using my tax dollars it will be interesting to see the results. What I found funny in the article is the people attacking the experimental program.
Well er yeah I mean isnt that the point? Why else are some people stuck in poverty if not by behavior (either by choice or circumstances of their situtation) or by lack of hard work (again either by choice or circumstance)? Are some people just 'magically' born poor that no amount of hard work or encouragement will solve it? If your offering cash to people who take a course in something that will maybe get them a job isn't that indeed addressing the problem? Your encouraging them by saying hey go out there do your best and succeed and if you do at the end we'll give you 1,000 dollars and you will have acquired that skill to get a job. In theory it sounds like a win-win situtation and certainly worth the 50million in private donations the city has raised to atleast attempt it."It just reinforces the impression that if everybody would just work hard enough and change their personal behavior we could solve poverty in this country, and that's not reflected in the facts," said Margy Waller, co-founder of Inclusion, a research and policy group in Washington.
So I dont see how someone can come in and go oh your giving them the impression that hard work and changes in their life will actually make their life better.... I mean who knows maybe the problem will be a complete bust but hey worth a shot. I know if it was using city dollars its probably a program Id groan at but I like Bloomberg's seeking outside money to attempt it, its a good way to gauge the actual success of social programs. If it fails well it fails but if it managed to succeed then atleast it will provide some actual basis of success to warrant looking at making it a real city program.