Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

  1. #21

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    First time today tried this mod and I totally agree with you mate. Ayyubids somehow better but Rums are totally a joke. p.s. Ayyubids are not as decent as other factions, just better than Rum.

    Also Cumans are terrible. Why all horse archers have parthian shoot? How georgian horse archers can be better than Seljuq or Cuman? There are too many unbearable things and stopped playing very first day. I'm sorry for saying this, unit models are really good and I believe you worked a lot on this but mod has any balance when it comes to Islamic and Christian factions? Sadly no. A big big No.

    Just check how many spear, sword type of units any Christian army has and check Rums. 1 spear, 2 axe... No shock cav (which is historically Seljuqs had shock cavalry) a few horse archers, no any top tier-unique ha at all. Why would anyone bother to play Seljuq on this mod? Well even the challenge has nothing to offer. Probably in first buildings you gonna get all units then rest of the game no need to focus anything because of monotone game-play.

    Hope you guys do something to get balance and we enjoy this mod.

    Greetings.
    A friend advises in his interest, not yours.

  2. #22

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    The rosters aren't finished yet. What you just played are demo versions. Just be patiënt.

  3. #23

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    Quote Originally Posted by Filips Augustus View Post
    The rosters aren't finished yet. What you just played are demo versions. Just be patiënt.
    I see. Good news indeed.

    You're with development team? I hope you add Armenian Cavalry, Arabic and Persian warriors, Frankish(european in overall) knights, Romano-Frankish cavalry, Georgians, Daylami Infantry, Rus guards(from Ukraine) Siqlabis (Southern Slavic warriors) to Seljuq Army. They're all historically fought for the Sultan of Rum.
    A friend advises in his interest, not yours.

  4. #24
    dogukan's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Middle freaking east
    Posts
    7,779

    Default Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    I might be a little annoying about this but the new broken crescent really does have some amazing models for turkic units from anatolia to greater ıran area.

    And they look reasonable if not accurate. Some really good looking seljukid and nomad style units as well as ghazis and tribal infantry with accurate helmets, armors, long braided hair and kaftans.
    They are so cute and pretty


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    "Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
    Marx to A.Ruge

  5. #25
    bigdaddy1204's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dar al-Islam
    Posts
    1,896

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    The Islamic factions are the most important for me, alongside the Empire of Nicaea.

    I remember when Medieval 2 Total War came out, the Islamic and Byzantine factions were specifically disadvantaged versus the Catholic factions. For example, the Islamic factions could only build a dhow from the port, which is weaker than the equivalent Catholic unit from the same building. Same thing applied with the castle; western factions got knights, but Islamic ones only got the Arab cavalry, which was a weaker light cavalry unit. Also the distribution of starting provinces favoured the western factions, with a number of settlements anachronistically given to western factions when they were in fact under Islamic or Byzantine control at the start date. In addition, the unit rosters of the eastern factions were weaker generally, with lots of poor quality infantry and ranged units, and very few heavy troops. In addition, the number of factions was also unbalanced, with something like 18 Catholic factions and just three Muslim ones. And such good units as were available had to wait until late game. All in all, it was very unbalanced and very unfair.

    I am certain that this mod will do a better job than that. I'll play the mod a bit more tonight to test this. (mostly I don't play because I'm waiting for the campaign).
    Last edited by bigdaddy1204; September 23, 2016 at 04:30 AM.

  6. #26

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    Quote Originally Posted by River Lord View Post
    I see. Good news indeed.

    You're with development team? I hope you add Armenian Cavalry, Arabic and Persian warriors, Frankish(european in overall) knights, Romano-Frankish cavalry, Georgians, Daylami Infantry, Rus guards(from Ukraine) Siqlabis (Southern Slavic warriors) to Seljuq Army. They're all historically fought for the Sultan of Rum.
    If anyone asks source for this;

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Btw, if you need any info or pic (I believe you also have lots of pics but just saying) I can provide whatever I have about Seljuqs.

    Greetings.
    A friend advises in his interest, not yours.

  7. #27
    Påsan's Avatar Hva i helvete?
    Citizen

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    the north way
    Posts
    13,916

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    There's no point testing. 13th century arab factions cant match 16th century european ones. Wait until the arabs and turks get an update.

  8. #28

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    Quote Originally Posted by Påsan View Post
    There's no point testing. 13th century arab factions cant match 16th century european ones. Wait until the arabs and turks get an update.
    You mean 15th Century? Its still a valid test if one matches Tier 1 Ayyubid/Rum units with Tier 1 Western units as well.

    Tier 1 vs Tier 2/3? Well, that's would be obviously imbalanced (Because Tier 2&3 Middle Eastern Units are not yet on the mod, still need working)

  9. #29
    Kjertesvein's Avatar Remember to smile
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Miðaldir
    Posts
    6,679
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0

    Default Re: Anyone else dissappointed with the Islamic factions?

    Quote Originally Posted by River Lord View Post
    source
    You're in no way obliged to cite a source, because what you're stating isn't very controversial.

    In general, if you're going to provide sources, then you need to understand that this isn't a source. A source is a way for everyone to verify that what you're saying can be backed up by an informative authority on the topic. Both secondary sources (processed information, for example a book worked on by a relevant author) and primary sources (evidence which stems from the event as close in geography and time as possible) are fine. The latter is often better, but citing a plain text is neither. This is the internet and everyone can literally be anyone. The main point here is that we want to have a discussion based on knowledge, not trust.

    ~Wille
    Thorolf was thus armed. Then Thorolf became so furious that he cast his shield on his back, and, grasping his halberd with both hands, bounded forward dealing cut and thrust on either side. Men sprang away from him both ways, but he slew many. Thus he cleared the way forward to earl Hring's standard, and then nothing could stop him. He slew the man who bore the earl's standard, and cut down the standard-pole. After that he lunged with his halberd at the earl's breast, driving it right through mail and body, so that it came out at the shoulders; and he lifted him up on the halberd over his head, and planted the butt-end in the ground. There on the weapon the earl breathed out his life in sight of all, both friends and foes. [...] 53, Egil's Saga
    I must tell you here of some amusing tricks the Comte d'Eu played on us. I had made a sort of house for myself in which my knights and I used to eat, sitting so as to get the light from the door, which, as it happened, faced the Comte d'Eu's quarters. The count, who was a very ingenious fellow, had rigged up a miniature ballistic machine with which he could throw stones into my tent. He would watch us as we were having our meal, adjust his machine to suit the length of our table, and then let fly at us, breaking our pots and glasses.
    - The pranks played on the knight Jean de Joinville, 1249, 7th crusade.













    http://imgur.com/a/DMm19
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    This is the only forum I visit with any sort of frequency and I'm glad it has provided a home for RTR since its own forum went down in 2007. Hopefully my donation along with others from TWC users will help get the site back to its speedy heyday, which will certainly aid us in our endeavor to produce a full conversion mod Rome2.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •