Page 17 of 47 FirstFirst ... 78910111213141516171819202122232425262742 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 930

Thread: UNITS ROSTERS discussion

  1. #321

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Could someone please tell me if it is possible to recruit mamluk units if you are playing as the Abbasaids or the Zengids if so could you please tell me how thanks.
    you dont need mamluks for these factions,you can recruit ghulams which are the same with mamluks ie the egyptian ghulams were called mamluks.

    also i would like to ask,have the muslim faction rosters been reworked?
    it doesnt seem to be mentioned in the changelog of 0.9
    Last edited by excubitor; February 10, 2016 at 07:33 AM.

  2. #322
    Boogie Knight's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    The Kingdom of Mercia
    Posts
    631

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Playing as the Crusader States, early era, I've not seen any Mamluks from the Egyptians at all. Only Ghulams, mounted and on foot. Is this correct?

  3. #323
    jurcek1987's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    4,084

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by Boogie Knight View Post
    Playing as the Crusader States, early era, I've not seen any Mamluks from the Egyptians at all. Only Ghulams, mounted and on foot. Is this correct?
    Yes, I think Mamluks only rise when the Mongols appear. In any case, you'd see a Mamluks rise event first.

  4. #324

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    a question about berbers units...is it correct historicalment berber pikemen? the berbers used the pike? or is better a spearmen unit as lamtuna? i guess tthat the pike in early medieval era is used for scottish,byzzies and flemish...
    THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
    THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!



    Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW

  5. #325

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Yes it is. I've read about pikemen in several sources, otherwise I wouldn't have implemented the unit.

  6. #326

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    -Pavisier spearmen and mislile pavisier unit should be added for France. They are mentioned in hundred years war.

  7. #327

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    I think they are mentioned as mercenaries if im correct.

  8. #328
    +Marius+'s Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Zagreb
    Posts
    2,418

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by MWY View Post
    Yes it is. I've read about pikemen in several sources, otherwise I wouldn't have implemented the unit.
    Berber pikemen?

    Where did you read this?

  9. #329

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    I think they 'standard' army's used pavise shields.
    I have one idea about late european knights. Why not merge those helmet types into single unit, for more diversity?
    http://postimg.org/image/yj1zizipv/
    http://postimg.org/image/uf9ta5rbf/
    http://postimg.org/image/l5tdndsu9/


    Regarding Berber pikemen, when i was reaseraching almoravids army's, i think i also found that there was berber pikemen unit.

  10. #330
    +Marius+'s Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Zagreb
    Posts
    2,418

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by achilles-91 View Post
    Regarding Berber pikemen, when i was reaseraching almoravids army's, i think i also found that there was berber pikemen unit.
    Probably a mistranslation.

    There were no pike formations in North Africa since the age of Ptolemaic Egypt.

    This is what an Almoravid "pikeman" actually looked like;

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



    They were just spearmen.

  11. #331

  12. #332

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by +Marius+ View Post
    Probably a mistranslation.

    There were no pike formations in North Africa since the age of Ptolemaic Egypt.

    This is what an Almoravid "pikeman" actually looked like;

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



    They were just spearmen.
    yes marius i also think that they were spearmen units, not pikemen and phalanx formation...they were more on less as this...so MWY should explain about this problematic unit haha and also about muslims units rosters

    THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
    THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!



    Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW

  13. #333

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    I think I read about them at a battle in wikipedia. Might have been a mistranslation perhaps.. I couldnt find the wikipedia link in a quick search and there are different discussions about the unit.

    Here:

    http://oldforum.paradoxplaza.com/for...cussion/page43

    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...he-XVI-Century

    This source also mentions pikemen specifically:

    http://unincountry.blogspot.de/2015/...d-dynasty.html

    @executior: Most of the muslim rosters have been the same, but the transitions are now better and I think all units are enabled in the campaign. I don't think we need to change the early rosters much further, the muslim factions are still lacking late game units after the mamluk transition. Moors are especially lacking in evolution, but that's kind of a problem because it was basically the same in history.
    Last edited by MWY; February 15, 2016 at 04:35 PM.

  14. #334
    +Marius+'s Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Zagreb
    Posts
    2,418

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Found literally nothing to corroborate those forum posts nor the blogpost.

    Probably a mistranslation, someone read "phalanx" and automatically binded the term with pikes, after which other mentions just followed suit without checking.

  15. #335

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    i think too that pikemen among the berbers was not real,nothing against the moorish but i think they where not disciplinet enough too use act as pikemen,thought i can be wrong here.

  16. #336

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    i have been searching about berbers pikemen and only i have found units with big spears and shield...about this...

    i guess that the phalanx formation is not used for berbers, only they had largues spears with shields against cavalry, similar to byzantine kontarion but they donīt make the pike formation...
    THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
    THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!



    Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW

  17. #337

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by j.a.luna View Post
    i have been searching about berbers pikemen and only i have found units with big spears and shield...about this...

    i guess that the phalanx formation is not used for berbers, only they had largues spears with shields against cavalry, similar to byzantine kontarion but they donīt make the pike formation...
    This one is Black guard

  18. #338

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    yes, is similar to black guard but are berbers spearmen and this is the most largues spears that i have seen in berbers...they donīt use pikes as byzantines or scottish and less the phalanx formation, i guess that the unit berber pikemen is unhistorical and it should be a unit with largue spears and big shields as the image...
    THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
    THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!



    Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW

  19. #339
    Boogie Knight's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    The Kingdom of Mercia
    Posts
    631

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    As spearmen, they could still have a boost against cavalry. Just... not as big a one as pikemen get. Do we have anything about what the Moors' response was to cavalry, at all?

  20. #340

    Default Re: NEW FACTIONS UNITS ROSTERS

    Quote Originally Posted by Boogie Knight View Post
    As spearmen, they could still have a boost against cavalry. Just... not as big a one as pikemen get. Do we have anything about what the Moors' response was to cavalry, at all?
    all spearmen in SSHIP have just "light_spear", no damage bonus or anything, neither pikes have a bonus damage against cav, they have just "spear" and "pike" attributes

    however a spear damage bonus can be added with "spear_bonus_x" x can be 2,4,6,8,10,12

    a cavalry charge straight into ready spearman with max attributes results in lots of casualties BOTH for the cav and the spearman, i think this is really needed now with the cavalry buff in the new version

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •