Those two names were just off the top of my head and Dorylaion was later rebuilt by Manuel. Currently there's a big gap between western Anatolia and Konya and Ankara so adding one of those two cities would make sense imo.
Those two names were just off the top of my head and Dorylaion was later rebuilt by Manuel. Currently there's a big gap between western Anatolia and Konya and Ankara so adding one of those two cities would make sense imo.
I already did change the tunis region a bit for the next release.
Well, the only faction we could add for that time would be the zirids, but they were not really a faction anymore. I know that the area is somewhat lacking right now, but I can't really change that. Pisa and Venice are obviously important to balance italy a little. Mongols will be pretty scary with the next version.
So no, no factions changes will be coming atleast for the next release, sorry.
Concerning anatolia: Name me an important city under rum control at that time and I will definitely check it. One more region would be good for them, but I don't just want to give them historically unimportant/useless cities.
Actually, the only faction I can see in that area for that period is the Armenians of Cilicia. Not sure it is worth to include them and to remove another faction.
Under the patronage of Flinn, proud patron of Jadli, from the Heresy Vault of the Imperial House of Hader
They seem scary enough already. In my last ERE campaign I won about 30 battles and they were still militarily by far the the strongest faction. They blitzed the Great Seljuks in about 20 turns. I actually stopped playing because I got bored defending the same settlements over and over again.
Will check regarding important Rum cities at that time, but if none can be found it might be best to add an unimportant but strategically well positioned city just for gameplay sake.
Last edited by jurcek1987; October 19, 2015 at 09:32 AM.
Ooh great, sounds exciting! Can't wait to see
Did you mean one of the existing rebel-held cities, or to create an entirely new region? If it is the former, I'd say give them Sivas, since that will stop Georgia from expanding too far west. If it is the latter, possibly something similar to what jurcek suggested, a settlement in that region between Ankara/Konya and the coastal cities. One that comes to mind is Eskisehir, also known as Dorylaeum. It does seem to have been an important strategic location. If the Turks could hold it, then they'd have a base close to Nicaea, enabling them to threaten the entire Byzantine western Anatolia. But if the Byzantines could hold it, they'd have a base dangerously close to the Rum Seljuk capital at Konya, enabling them to threaten or even conquer central Anatolia.
The city was fortified by Byzantine Emperor Manuel Komnenos during his Myriokephalon campaign in 1176. It was also the sight of battles during the First and Second Crusades. Isparta, and Laodicaea, are two other possibilities.
Last edited by bigdaddy1204; October 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM.
Yes, you're right.
Looking at the sources for Tunisia, we have Zirid rule until 1057, at which point much of the region is overrun by the Banu Hilal emirates. This situation continues until the Normans capture much of it between 1134 and 1160. But in 1160 the Almohads (Moors) capture it, and hold it until 1229, when the Hafsid dynasty establishes the first major power centred in the region since the Zirids nearly 200 years earlier.
So it's true, there was a power vacuum and chaos in the region at exactly the time our game is set. I guess it (the history) is just a shame from the gameplay point of view. If I was working for CA, my inclination would be to 'bend' the history a little bit and have a merged Zirid/Hafsid faction.
To be fair though, I'm glad the mod is alive and well and will be happy to see it released, whatever form it takes
But Sivas was held by the Danishmends, and Dorylaeum, Isparta and Laodicaea were all Byzantine or ruined at the time. Although of course technically the Danishmend leader Melik Gazi conquered Ankara in 1127, and Mesud didn't recapture it until 1143 so we are already taking a bit of a liberty with historical accuracy in that region.
Aksaray and Gangra would be the best candidates for additional cities held by the Seljuks in 1132.
Perhaps one alternative would be to have a scripted AI sequence which sees the AI Seljuks progressively acquire Kayseri, Sivas and Malatya from rebels at the appropriate intervals, simulating the collapse of the Danishmends and their incorporation into Rum. Although that would require them to survive a determined human player for more than a few turns, and doesn't necessarily help them fare better against the AI.
Last edited by Swarbs; October 19, 2015 at 03:01 PM.
They are doing OK in my current Egypt campaign, which is now over 100 turns in. As you can see, the AI Turks have taken over their historical territories, and have even captured Attaleia from the Byzantines. I haven't interacted with Anatolia at all during my campaign, although to be fair I did slaughter the Byzantines by sacking Dyrrhachion, Thessalonica, Constantinople, Nicaea, Smyrna and exterminating their population, as well as capturing Crete.
In my Egypt campaign, much of my effort has gone into capturing the provinces to the west, in Libya, Tunisia and then recapturing Sicily for the Fatimid caliph. I captured Sicily fairly early in my campaign, but then lost it again to a Norman Sicily invasion and due to a combined Abbassid and Zengid invasion of Syria, plus a rebellion in Mecca, it was quite some time before I was in a position to raise an army and transport them all the way west to recapture the island. But eventually I defeated the combined armies of the Normans and the Venetians and recaptured Palermo once more. This time I decided to take no chances, and I have stationed a full army in the city. I've also made peace with the westerners, although I do not trust them. But for the time being, the island is securely mine. I am now thinking, with the west secured, to turn to the east once more and liberate Iraq.
Alternatively though, I could take an Arab army north and strike at Rome... it's not far from Palermo! I have a strong fleet, and the thought of unseating those Crusader dogs in their Catholic homeland is appealing. The cry 'Allahu akbar' shall replace the sound of church bells in Rome. La ilaha illla-lah, Muhammadur rasulla lah!
In my campaigns, it really depends: sometimes Rûm gets ripe out quite fast and some other times, they get pretty well.
@bigdaddy1204, if you go further North, I'm sure you'll get a lot of "Crusader dogs friends" up there
Under the patronage of Flinn, proud patron of Jadli, from the Heresy Vault of the Imperial House of Hader
Actually we do not know that for sure, in 1038, the Byzantine general George Maniakes conquered the city and half the island, sending the relics of St. Lucy to Constantinople.
The conquest of 1086 might have just been a Norman taking of an independent settlement since there was no known Emir since 1044, a lot of the christian cities in the island already rebelled long before the Normans came...which is one of the main reason they came in the first place.
Yeah, calm down there buddy.
Yes lol, I have written a very fun AAR post about it in the 'post your empires' thread, which can be seen here with lots of pictures
http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...1#post14736696
Wow, interesting. I didn't know that.
Under the patronage of Flinn, proud patron of Jadli, from the Heresy Vault of the Imperial House of Hader
Last edited by bigdaddy1204; October 20, 2015 at 05:13 AM.
Oh yes, these priests gave me some hard time
Under the patronage of Flinn, proud patron of Jadli, from the Heresy Vault of the Imperial House of Hader
Lol. Yup!
Of course, the real scholars of Islam are a bit uncomfortable with the word in the way I've used it, as political jihad is not universally accepted as the correct way of the term. It also has another meaning, which many people say is the primary one, in which it means 'the inner struggle with our own emotions', where we seek to master negative emotions such as anger or pride and instead change them into positive emotions of peace, mercy, respect, kindness and goodness.
This position is supported by the Hadith (sayings) of the Prophet Muhammad, who said that the 'inner jihad' to become a better, more honest and truthful person is the greater jihad. It's a shame that newspapers in mainstream media never bother to report that. But it's known by Muslims.
Last edited by bigdaddy1204; October 20, 2015 at 10:20 AM.